Cases 131 - 140 of 2,309
SCOTT v. BUFFALOE
as 1:2022cv00707
Petitioner:
WILLIAM C. SCOTT
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TYLER v. DAVIDSON COUNTY
as 1:2022cv00743
Petitioner:
KEYWAHN O'BRIEN TYLER, JR.
Respondent:
DAVIDSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SHARPE v. N.C. STATE
as 1:2022cv00596
Petitioner:
JERRY L. SHARPE
Respondent:
N.C. STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCOTT v. BUFFALOE et al
as 1:2022cv00802
Petitioner:
WILLIAM COLEMAN SCOTT
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR. and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BURTON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00803
Petitioner:
JOHNATHAN BURTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2022cv00024
Petitioner:
AISHA HELSA DAVIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SELLARS v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2022cv00634
Petitioner:
KELVIN W. SELLARS
Respondent:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RODRIGUEZ v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2022cv00661
Petitioner:
LUIS A. PEREZ RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SATTERFIELD v. PERSON COUNTY
as 1:2022cv00722
Petitioner:
MARCUS A. SATTERFIELD
Respondent:
PERSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JACOBS v. BOP et al
as 1:2022cv00726
Petitioner:
CORY LEE JACOBS
Respondent:
BOP and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
