Cases 1 - 10 of 39
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOYCE v. USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH, ANGELA MOORE, HENRY ROGERS, JR-SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS-BEY v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
ALPHONZA L.P. THOMAS-BEY and ABDI KEBA-BEY
Defendant:
SHARON A. DAVIS, CURTISS MORRISS, ROY COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORR. INST., RITHIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAXTER v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS BAXTER
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, ROY COOPER, SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAXTER v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS BAXTER
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, ROY COOPER, SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARRINGTON v. COOPER et al
as 1:2021cv00746
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOHN STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. GREENWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00488
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, PROSECTORIAL DISTRICT, J. CLARK FISCHER and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. KEVEER et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, J. CLARK FISCHER, TIFFANY A. HALL and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. KEVEER et al
as 1:2021cv00060
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, J. CLARK FISCHER, TIFFANY A. HALL and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
