Cases 11 - 20 of 20
SIMMONS v. ATKINSON et al
as 1:2013cv01117
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
GRAHAM ATKINSON and RANDALL SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv01054
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, GRAHAM ATKINSON and RANDALL SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv01051
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, GRAHAM ATKINSON, RANDALL SHELTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv01031
Plaintiff:
JACOB LEE WHITE
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, GRAHAM ATKINSON and RANDALL SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2013cv01013
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, GRAHAM ATKINSON and RANDALL SHELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMPKINS v. HERRON et al
as 1:2011cv00224
Plaintiff:
STUART WAYNE TOMPKINS
Defendant:
JOEL HERRON, WILLIAM HYATT, JOHN DOE PURCELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOWNEY v. ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2011cv00151
Plaintiff:
WILLIE GRAHAM DOWNEY, JR.
Defendant:
ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. ATKINSON ET AL.,
as 1:2009cv00088
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
GRAHAM ATKINSON, J.C. MELTON and SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SIMMONS v. ATKINSON et al
as 1:2009cv00094
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
GRAHAM ATKINSON, TONY HOLYFIELD, DEAN CULLER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SIMMONS v. ATKINSON et al
as 1:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
WALTER COLUMBUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
GRAHAM ATKINSON and J.C. MELTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
