Cases 171 - 180 of 1,375
FREEMAN v. WILLILAMS et al
as 1:2021cv00620
Plaintiff:
JOHN YUTANNA FREEMAN
Defendant:
ORGILL, INC., ORGILL SHARED SERVICES, LLC, ORGILL TRANSPORTATION CO. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENT v. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
as 1:2021cv00694
Plaintiff:
DONNA KENT
Defendant:
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX et al v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
as 1:2021cv00481
Plaintiff:
FELICIA MCILWAIN, JOE OVERCASH, WESLEY H. WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
GULF STATES AIRCRAFT SALES, LLC et al v. AIRPLANE HOLDING, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00527
Plaintiff:
Gulf States Aircraft Sales, LLC, SouthTec Aviation, LLC and Errol Bader
Defendant:
Airplane Holding, LLC and Michael Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TERRELL v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
DONALD TERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COLEY v. DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2021cv00511
Defendant:
DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMAS COLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CORBINO v. HEALTH CARE SERVICES GROUP
as 1:2021cv00462
Defendant:
HEALTH CARE SERVICES GROUP
Plaintiff:
DEBRA CORBINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STANHISER v. STANHISER et al
as 1:2021cv00407
Defendant:
JAMIE STANHISER and DARLENE CHEEK
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA STANHISER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIGGS v. CITIZENS ONE AUTO FINANCE
as 1:2021cv00398
Plaintiff:
JAVIER A. DIGGS
Defendant:
CITIZENS ONE AUTO FINANCE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BUNCH v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00467
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, LLC, TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARY BUNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
