Cases 91 - 100 of 3,111
A.M. v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Latoya Monley and A. M.
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, sheronica smith, SHERIFF RALPH KERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
CUMMINGS v. BIRDSEYE et al
as 1:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID CUMMINGS
Defendant:
SARAH BIRDSEYE, SARA ANDERSON, AJ BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
GREEN v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2023cv00969
Plaintiff:
REGIS KISHON GREEN
Defendant:
TERRY S. JOHNSON, CLIFF PARKER, DAVID SYKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GADDY v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
as 1:2023cv00938
Plaintiff:
Tammy Gaddy
Defendant:
UNC Health Care System and UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Gaddy v. E Hairston
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Tammy Gaddy
Defendant:
James E Hairston
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
WARREN v. BRASWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Warren, Jr.
Defendant:
Tyler Braswell, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, New Hanover County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ABRAHAM v. MCDOUGAL, et al.
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ABRAHAM, SR.
Defendant:
TRAVIS MCDOUGAL, THOMAS ZOPODVA, C. A. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
