Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00660
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FENNER v. BELL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00367
Plaintiff: WALDO FENNER
Defendant: BILL BELL, PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN W. CHALMERS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00119
Plaintiff: EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant: DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD BRODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00953
Plaintiff: RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant: DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPT., AARON GRAVES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
EVANS et al v. DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00739
Plaintiff: DAVID F. EVANS, DAVID F. EVANS, DAVID F. EVANS and others
Defendant: DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF, MARK GOTTLIEB, MARK GOTTLIEB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00712
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00713
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?