Cases 11 - 20 of 3,122
JONES v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ROBERT JONES
Defendant:
THE CITY OF GREENSBORO and GREENSBORO FIRE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SMITH v. WINSTON SALEM NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
as 1:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE SMITH
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SMITH v. GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE SMITH
Defendant:
GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JACOBSEN v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
KAREN JACOBSEN
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, MICHAEL HUGGINS and others
FREEMAN et al v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY FREEMAN and C. B.
Defendant:
MARBELY SANCHEZ, GREGORY J. SEABOLT and CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
