Cases 1 - 10 of 23
CUMMINGS v. BIRDSEYE et al
as 1:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID CUMMINGS
Defendant:
SARAH BIRDSEYE, SARA ANDERSON, AJ BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
PETRISOR v. RODGERS et al
as 1:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
DAVID PETRISOR
Defendant:
D. RODGERS, J. SWARINGEN and R. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. VILSACK
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Andrea Walker
Defendant:
THOMAS J. VILSACK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALLEN v. DURHAM CO. MAGISTRATE OFFICE et al
as 1:2020cv00090
Defendant:
DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JUDGE DORETTIA WALKER, DURHAM COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALL, et al v. C & S RAIL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00986
Plaintiff:
AUBREY MARSHALL, RICKY LEE JONES, JR., DAVID WALKER and others
Defendant:
JACK WILSON, JASON WILSON, DUSTIN WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NEUMILLER v. CITY OF SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2019cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Roger Neumiller
Defendant:
CITY OF SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA and Lee Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00760
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
WALKER v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00078
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL F. WALKER
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and HOKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
BULLOCK v. ANDREWS et al
as 1:2015cv00523
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ALVIN BULLOCK, III
Defendant:
SHARA ANDREWS, TRAVIS WALKER, HENRY GALLEWAY, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
