Cases 141 - 150 of 10,042
MYERS v. BRATWAITHE et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
JARMAL LAMAR MYERS
Defendant:
STEPHANIE BRATWAITHE, PHILLIP TOLMAN, MICHAEL L. SWARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HONEA v. HOGAN et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. HONEA
Defendant:
ALLEGRA HOGAN, MICHAEL AMEZQUITA, MIKE WIZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, ROY A. COOPER III, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWER v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT CENTRAL PRISON
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
TRENT LORON BREWER
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT CENTRAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. DOE et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, STAFF: MR. BULLARDS, MR. RANSOME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
BRANDON OTHA MARTIN
Defendant:
CHARLES F. BIRKHEAD, MRS. SPENCER, MRS. HOLLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
JON C. SPRAUVE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and PSYCHIATRIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISOM v. USA
as 1:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
BENNY LYNN ISOM
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MCCRARY v. BENFIELD et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. MCCRARY
Defendant:
OFFICER J. BENFIELD, 13 UNKNOWN OFFICERS and ROWAN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANALCO v. USA
as 1:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
EVELINA MARTINEZ ANALCO
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
