Cases 151 - 160 of 241
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, JEFFREY BAREFOOT, R. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2017cv00879
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN RANDOLPH MITCHELL
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, WILLIAM T. SCHATZMAN, ROBERT SLATER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, R. M. ASHLEY, RON SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. PAGE et al
as 1:2017cv00649
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEE NEAL
Defendant:
SAM PAGE, ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and ROCKINGHAM COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. MACKEY et al
as 1:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
K. D. MACKEY, C.C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEY v. WATKINS et al
as 1:2017cv00354
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMAS COLEY
Defendant:
K. WATKINS, J. RAWLINGS, HIGH POINT POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRINSON v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
MARTIN DAVID BRINSON
Defendant:
CHRISS DAVIS, PAMILCO SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BOUFORT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01408
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLELLAND v. COGAR et al
as 1:2016cv01404
Plaintiff:
JAMES FRANKLIN MCCLELLAND
Defendant:
D. COGAR, NORTH CAROLINA SHERIFF'S EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMISSION and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
