Cases 11 - 20 of 56
JONES v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
HENRY CALVIN JONES
Defendant:
MALINDA THOMAS, MS. GROOMS, MICHAEL L. SCARBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. DOES et al
as 1:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
JOHN DOES and JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMA ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HONEYCUTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORR. INST., RITHIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. AUTEN et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
KEVIN AUTEN, JOHN DOE #2, K-9 OFFICER JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KINCAID v. UNC CHAPEL HILL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2021cv00884
Plaintiff:
DONALD KINCAID
Defendant:
UNC CHAPEL HILL HOSPITAL, DR. MS. JANE DOE and NCDPS DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADEYOLA v. REDDY et al
as 1:2021cv00886
Plaintiff:
UMAR ADEYOLA
Defendant:
DR. EDAVALLY REDDY, NP JENNIFER ADKINS, RN BUTTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. HARMON et al
as 1:2021cv00877
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant:
LISA HARMON, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSKEY v. U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv00773
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL H. FOSKEY
Defendant:
U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, JANET YELLEN, CHARLES P. RETTIG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
