Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 50
TYLER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00149
Defendant: OFFICER A. M. COBB, OFFICER C.J. REYNOLDS, OFFICER N.A. TESH and others
Plaintiff: XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRADY v. STAFF AT SOUTHERN C.I. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00054
Defendant: OFFICER. B. SMITH, KEVIN KING, DR. EDWARD LANCE and others
Plaintiff: TRACEY TERRELL GRADY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00834
Plaintiff: KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant: MR. SMITH, JOHN DOE, MR. TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. KING We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00721
Petitioner: DAVID ANTHONY MCKINNEY
Respondent: KELVIN T. KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TYLER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00711
Defendant: A. B. CONRAD, G. J. MORALES, CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM and others
Plaintiff: XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. WINSON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00401
Defendant: A. B. CONRAD, C. J. REYNOLDS, WINSON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff: XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNCAN BEY v. HOOKS
as 1:2019cv00015
Petitioner: KING DAVID T. DUNCAN BEY
Respondent: ERIC A. HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PERDUE v. PAGE et al
as 1:2016cv01323
Plaintiff: BOBBY JOHNATHAN PERDUE, II
Defendant: SAMUAL PAGE, B. KING and E. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. USA
as 1:2016cv00690
Petitioner: ANTHONY WAYNE KING
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SELLERS v. LEE et al
as 1:2015cv00659
Plaintiff: KELVIN SELLERS
Defendant: ANDREW LEE and KING DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?