Cases 31 - 40 of 49
HERNANDEZ v. USA
as 1:2016cv00809
Petitioner:
JOSE RENE AMAYA HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HERNANDEZ v. USA
as 1:2016cv00841
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BAUTISTA-HERNANDEZ v. USA
as 1:2016cv00661
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
VICTOR MANUEL BAUTISTA-HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
NUNEZ v. ACEVEDO et al
as 1:2013cv00926
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO HERNANDEZ NUNEZ
Defendant:
JOSE ACEVEDO, SMITH and THE SHERIFF'S DPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ v. HOKE CO. JAIL SHERIFF'S OFFICE OR DEPT. et al
as 1:2013cv00794
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO HERNANDEZ NUNEZ
Defendant:
HOKE CO. JAIL SHERIFF'S OFFICE OR DEPT., JOSE ACEVEDO and US MARSHALL'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERNANDEZ v. DANIELS
as 1:2013cv00686
Petitioner:
OLVIN ALEXANDER ARAND HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
DENNIS DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00649
Petitioner:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CONGRESS and UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERNANDEZ v. DANIELS
as 1:2013cv00578
Petitioner:
IFREN RUMBO HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
DENNIS DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00378
Petitioner:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF CONGRESS and DAVIE COUNTY COURT, NC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERNANDEZ v. FORSYTH COUNTY COURT, NC et al
as 1:2013cv00379
Petitioner:
CECIO H. HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
FORSYTH COUNTY COURT, NC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
