Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 41 - 50 of 163
MERIS v. SETTLES et al
as 1:2020cv00776
Defendant: CAPTAIN SETTLES, K. ADAMS, GREEN and others
Plaintiff: CLYDE JUNIOR MERIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERCE v. SPAIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00711
Defendant: STEPHANIE STEMPLE, M.D., LINDSEY SPAIN, SANTANA DEBERRY and others
Plaintiff: CORIANTE L. PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. GOLDSBROUGH et al
as 1:2020cv00605
Defendant: PAUL A. SHANNER, SUSAN SPONATE, RONALD J. SHORT and others
Plaintiff: XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2020cv00543
Plaintiff: CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant: LANCE CUNNINGHAM, UNIT MANAGER MILES KIVETT, CAPTAIN B. WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2020cv00391
Plaintiff: CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant: DOCTOR CUNNINGHAM, DOCTOR MARK HAZELRIGG, LT. WHITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYCE v. PUGH OIL CO. INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00189
Defendant: RICHARD K. PUGH, BETTY PUGH, ALAN VERGIL PUGH and others
Plaintiff: EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAL v. VADEN
as 1:2020cv00038
Defendant: K. D. VADEN
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. BRANNON et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant: OFFICER K. B. STEWART, MAGISTRATE H. D. BRANNON, RANDOLPH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff: QUANTEZ THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALL v. WELLS
as 1:2019cv01137
Respondent: BRYAN K. WELLS
Petitioner: RAYMOND C. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSS v. MCMILLAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01032
Defendant: K. MCMILLAN, LOCKLEAR, ADKINS and others
Plaintiff: JOHN CHAVIS ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?