Cases 41 - 50 of 72
FULLARD v. STALEY et al
as 1:2015cv00016
Plaintiff:
REGINALD U. FULLARD
Defendant:
TWANDA STALEY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, FORSYTH CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEBANE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE MEBANE
Defendant:
PATRICIA HOFFMAN, D.H.O. DESIGNATED HEARING OFFICER, DR. SAMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASTRO v. HOLLINGSWORTH et al
as 1:2013cv01087
Plaintiff:
MARIO OHOA CASTRO
Defendant:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH, FCI FOR DIX DIRECTOR FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES, ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GOLDMAN v. MAHER, et al
as 1:2013cv00389
Plaintiff:
LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant:
THOMAS K. MAHER, DANIELLE M. CARMAN, HEATHER L. RATTELADE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2013cv00031
Petitioner:
MATTHEW DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TAYLOR v. USA
as 1:2013cv00039
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BILLY TAYLOR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BARLEY v. USA
as 1:2013cv00019
Petitioner:
MARCUS DORAN BARLEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
STREET v. USA
as 1:2013cv00007
Petitioner:
HERASHIO ANTONIO STREET
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
EDWARDS v. USA
as 1:2012cv01378
Petitioner:
STEVEN E. EDWARDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SHAW v. USA
as 1:2012cv01340
Petitioner:
JAMES CECIL SHAW
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
