Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CARANZA v. PYLES et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. CARANZA
Defendant:
OFFICER PYLES, OFFICER SHAFFER, WARDEN DAVID CASSIDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELTON v. FIELDS
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
DARREN S. BELTON
Defendant:
RONNIE FIELDS, BILL FLINT, MS. GARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. FLINT et al
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
BILL FLINT, RONNIE FIELDS, MS. BONNIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant:
MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MOORE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE/DEPT., BILL FLINT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCALLISTER v. ARAMARK CORRECTION SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv00371
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, CAROL BOSHOLM, DAWN QUASHIE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIELDS v. USA
as 1:2020cv00301
Petitioner:
DAVID MAURICE FIELDS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FULLARD v. COOPER et al
as 1:2019cv01085
Petitioner:
REGINALD U. FULLARD
Respondent:
ROY COOPER, MR. FIELDS, JR. and KENNETH LASSITER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITAKER v. PENNELL et al
as 1:2018cv01044
Defendant:
C. MYERS, NATHAN SEAMSTER, DEAN M. SOUTHERN, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
PARRIS E. WHITAKER and ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANADY v. FIELD et al
as 1:2015cv00479
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK CANADY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE FIELD, KATY POOLE, ALICE MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOMACK v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2015cv00316
Plaintiff:
GEOFFREY LEWIS WOMACK
Defendant:
COVINGTON, YOUNGER, MAPLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
