Cases 1 - 10 of 349
KING v. LUCUS et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Defendant:
MELANIE DAVIS, DEAN CULLER, HODGIN CARRIE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Petitioner:
ANTHONY L. HOOVER
Respondent:
STEPHEN WADDELL, JOHN GRAY and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PATRICK v. USA
as 1:2024cv00737
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JOHN PATRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ALEXANDER v. JAIYEOBA et al
as 1:2024cv00731
Defendant:
UNKNOWN SERGENT, L.S. GARRISON, TAIWO JAIYEOBA and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J. ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTLEDGE v. RUTLEDGE-CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2024cv00520
Defendant:
BILLY HALL, JR., CHARLOTTE, N.C., NEURALINK and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
CRUMP v. USA
as 1:2024cv00525
Petitioner:
JOHN ATLAS CRUMP
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HARRISON v. MCLEAN et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MR. NEU, ZERRANTI MCLEAN and others
Plaintiff:
YAW NYADU HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., SLONG, K. FINKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., OFFICER SLONG, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
