Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
TERRY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00385
Petitioner: DOYLE KENT TERRY
Respondent: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MATHIS v. USA
as 1:2016cv00922
Petitioner: DOUGLAS KENT MATHIS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
VAN DYKE v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv00678
Plaintiff: DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant: KENT BROWN, FRANK WITNEY, ROBERT DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2015cv00312
Plaintiff: DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant: THOMAS DAVIS, ROBERT JAMES DAVIS, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI v. SLUSSER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff: SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI
Defendant: SCOTT T. SLUSSER, SEAN PERRIN, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. PIEDMONT CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00668
Plaintiff: PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant: PIEDMONT CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL, TABOR CITY CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL, PENDER CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff: PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant: ROGER JAMES DAVIS, BRUSE BURGER, CHARLES VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHIS v. USA
as 1:2012cv00040
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: DOUGLAS KENT MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CLOWERS v. KENT
as 1:2009cv00790
Plaintiff: RICHARD MACK CLOWERS
Defendant: MR. KENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?