Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CABRERA v. USA
as 1:2023cv00129
Petitioner: JOSE ARMONDO RAMOS CABRERA
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RAMOS v. ADAMS
as 1:2022cv00960
Plaintiff: MIGUEL ANGEL FLOREZ RAMOS
Defendant: KAREN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES-RAMOS v. ATRIUM HEALTH
as 1:2022cv00533
Plaintiff: MIGUEL ANGEL FLORES-RAMOS
Defendant: ATRIUM HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2022cv00445
Plaintiff: RICKY BUTLER
Defendant: WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
RAMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00380
Plaintiff: MIGUEL ANGEL MEDRANO RAMOS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CRISP v. RAMOS
as 1:2021cv00821
Petitioner: PATRICK LEROY CRISP
Respondent: MR. RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SEGERS-MEIER v. RAMOS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00601
Petitioner: ELIJAH SEGERS-MEIER
Respondent: WARDEN R. RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CRISP v. RAMOS
as 1:2020cv01168
Petitioner: PATRICK LEROY CRISP
Respondent: WARDEN MR. RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ARNOLD v. ELIASON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00498
Plaintiff: TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant: RUSSELL A. ELIASON, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, COMBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. COMBS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00499
Plaintiff: TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Defendant: COMBS, THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RUSSELL A. ELIASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?