Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HUGULEY v. BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00263
Defendant:
ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, THE STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff:
MELDAMION ANTOINE HUGULEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLISON et al v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2019cv01126
Defendant:
SUSAN WORTINGER, KELLY COUNCILMAN, BRADLEY R. ALLEN, SR. and others
Plaintiff:
LEA ALLISON, KATHERINE GUILL and ANTONIO HARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNCAN v. SCHATZMAN et al
as 1:2019cv00353
Defendant:
K. ADAMS, SABEL CALDWELL, WENDY HOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TORREY DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURLEE v. FRANKS et al
as 1:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS E. CURLEE
Defendant:
GARY FRANKS and WENDY TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURLEE v. FRANKS et al
as 1:2017cv00375
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS E. CURLEE
Defendant:
GARY FRANKS, WENDY TERRY and C. SLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DALE v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION AND JUVENILE JUSTICE
as 1:2016cv00859
Petitioner:
WENDY DALE
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF ADULT CORRECTION AND JUVENILE JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TATE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2014cv00275
Plaintiff:
HERMAN V. TATE
Defendant:
LEWIS SMITH, RICHARD RUSSELL and WENDY BREWTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
HERMAN V. TATE
Defendant:
LEWIS SMITH, RICHARD RUSSELL and WENDY BREWTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
HERMAN V. TATE
Defendant:
LEWIS SMITH, RICHARD RUSSELL and WENDY BREWTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GEVARA v. BENNETT et al
as 1:2009cv00343
Plaintiff:
JORGE GEVARA
Defendant:
BOYD BENNETT, F.B. HUBBARD, CRUTCHFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
