Cases 1 - 10 of 58
WOOD v. WELLPATH, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00811
Plaintiff:
DAVID RYAN WOOD
Defendant:
WELLPATH, LLC, THE COUNTY OF ROWAN, J. TRAVIS ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHARDSON-BEY v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY
Defendant:
WARDEN M. SHELTON, SGT. WATSON, WARDEN BRAYBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYCE v. MOORE, et al.,
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
ANGELA MOORE, HENRY ROGERS, JR-SR, YVONNE CRAVEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. ANDOH et al
as 1:2022cv01104
Plaintiff:
JOVANTA C. WOODS
Defendant:
JOHN ANDOH, SYLVESTER VANN THOMPKINS and LINKS BUS TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. WOODS et al
as 1:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WILLIAM MITCHELL
Defendant:
LEUENANT WOODS, SGT. COMITO, LEUTENANT ROUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. LINKS BUS TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2022cv00946
Plaintiff:
JOVANTA C. WOODS
Defendant:
LINKS BUS TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMSEY v. BETHEA et al
as 1:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
MARIO DANT'E RAMSEY
Defendant:
T. BETHEA, J. LIMKEMANN, R. HESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOYCE v. SHEEN et al
as 1:2021cv00803
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
CLERK LYNDA SHEEN, REGISTER OF DEEDS ANN SHAW, SHERIFF LITCHARD HURLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD v. USA
as 1:2021cv00677
Petitioner:
DANIEL DEWAYNE WOOD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
