Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,028
MCCANTS v. HARRISON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00434
Plaintiff: TRAVUS MCCANTS
Defendant: CHUM HARRISON, FNU WOODARD, FNU NEALY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00425
Petitioner: RICKY ALLEN WILLIAMS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BRUTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00424
Petitioner: JARED BRUTON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
KING v. ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Petitioner: ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Respondent: ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SEAN BOONE, MAGGIE BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCCLARY v. BULLARD et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff: RONALD MCCLARY
Defendant: WILLIAM BULLARD, DOWD and RANSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. UNKNOWN STATE OFFICIALS
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff: RICHARD LEWIS JOHNSON
Defendant: UNKNOWN STATE OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMSON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2024cv00431
Plaintiff: TORSHAZO WILLIAMSON
Defendant: CAPTAIN MR. BROWN, SAM PAGE, CAPTAIN MS. JENNIFER BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASHORE v. NAVES
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff: RODRIQUEZ DWAYNE MASHORE
Defendant: SGT. JASON JAGGER NAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARVEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00421
Petitioner: KEVIN TERRELL HARVEY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MEDEL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00423
Petitioner: ADOLFO SOLANO MEDEL
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?