Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 11 - 20 of 62
TYLER v. BARCELLONA et al
as 1:2018cv00183
Plaintiff: MILO DANIEL TYLER
Defendant: TOM BARCELLONA, ANDREW P. CLEMENT, WILLIAMS W. BAGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH, ET AL. V. 3M COMPANY, ET AL. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00379
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, FARMERS CHEMICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., THE RUST ENGINEERING COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: SMITH, JULIAN JACKSON SMITH and DOROTHY E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
RILEY v. USA
as 1:2016cv00127
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: CARLOS ANTONIO RILEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RILEY v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv01106
Plaintiff: ANNIE W. RILEY
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
HESS v. CBS CORPORATION, et al
as 1:2015cv00936
Plaintiff: JAMES MICHAEL HESS
Defendant: CBS CORPORATION , DANIEL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, FISHER-KLOSTERMAN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RILEY v. USA
as 1:2015cv00671
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: JOHNATHEN LEWIS RILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GORE ET AL. V. 3M COMPANY, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00465
Plaintiff: WADE MILLER GORE and FAYE GORE
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WICKS v. WAL-MART DEPT. STORE MANAGER et al
as 1:2015cv00269
Plaintiff: DAVID BRYANT WICKS
Defendant: WAL-MART DEPT. STORE MANAGER, LAMAR SKELTON, CONCORD POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RILEY v. USA
as 1:2015cv00259
Petitioner: KYJAHRE HASAN RILEY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GRANT v. RILEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00075
Plaintiff: DEMAUREA GRANT
Defendant: BRAD RILEY, MARC A. NESBITT and MARVIN B. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?