Cases 11 - 20 of 129
SYMMES v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2022cv00821
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS SYMMES
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWFORD v. USA
as 1:2022cv00742
Petitioner:
RICKY DOUGLAS CRAWFORD, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HARDIN v. PEAKE et al
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, OFFICER WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAZELWOOD v. USA
as 1:2022cv00625
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS ALLEN HAZELWOOD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CRAWFORD v. USA
as 1:2022cv00608
Petitioner:
RICKY DOUGLAS CRAWFORD, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SYMMES v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2022cv00235
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILTON v. ALDERSON FEDERAL PRISON CAMP
as 1:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
EUGENIA DOUGLAS HILTON
Respondent:
ALDERSON FEDERAL PRISON CAMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00087
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
