Cases 11 - 20 of 23,900
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
KERR v. USA
as 1:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
NORMAN ALAN KERR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
UNIVERSAL PRESERVACHEM, INC. v. BRADY ENTERPRISES INC.
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSAL PRESERVACHEM, INC. and UNIVERSAL PRESERV-A-CHEM, INC.
Defendant:
BRADY ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BATTEN v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
KELLY BATTEN
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
YANG v. JOURNALISTIC, INC.
as 1:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN YANG
Defendant:
JOURNALISTIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
LITTLE & GORGEOUS INC. v. WAYT et al
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
LITTLE & GORGEOUS INC. doing business as WILD & GORGEOUS doing business as WILD & GORGEOUS TRANSFERS
Defendant:
RACHAEL WAYT and CALIBER APPARELL LLC doing business as WILD & WANTED TRANSFERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
ORTIZ v. PINCKNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MEDRANO ORTIZ
Defendant:
SHATEEMA PINCKNEY, TAMEKA SMITH, REGINA HAMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODBURY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WOODBURY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
CLOSNER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00411
Petitioner:
TERRY JAMES CLOSNER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BRADY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00267
Petitioner:
JOE LOUIS BRADY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
