Cases 21 - 29 of 29
WILLIAMS v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2011cv00868
Plaintiff:
PERCY ALLEN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
KEVIN M. BRIDGES and TANYA T. WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AGRIUM ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES (U.S.), INC. et al v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2009cv00856
Plaintiff:
AGRIUM ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES (U.S.), INC. and AGRUIM, INC.
Defendant:
JASON BRIDGES and BLUE WATER AGRONOMY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
DALF MUSIC COMPANY et al v. THE MCLAURIN GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00783
Plaintiff:
DALF MUSIC COMPANY, CALVIN BRIDGES D/B/A BRING IT BACK HOME MUSIC and MELVIN WILLIAMS MUSIC COMPANY
Defendant:
THE MCLAURIN GROUP INC. and HOWARD MCLAURIN, JR
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DALF MUSIC COMPANY et al v. THE MCLAURIN GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00784
Plaintiff:
DALF MUSIC COMPANY, CALVIN BRIDGES D/B/A BRING IT BACK HOME MUSIC and MELVIN WILLIAMS MUSIC COMPANY
Defendant:
THE MCLAURIN GROUP INC. and HOWARD MCLAURIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BRIDGES v. USA
as 1:2009cv00215
Petitioner:
JACQUELINE LYNNE BRIDGES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BRIDGES v. AUERBACH et al
as 1:2009cv00103
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE LYNNE BRIDGES
Defendant:
GERALD M. AUERBACH and J.M. EVANS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BRIDGES v. USA
as 1:2009cv00004
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JACQUELINE LYNNE BRIDGES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA v. SANDHILLS GRADING & PIPE CORPORATION ET AL
as 1:2007cv00551
Plaintiff:
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SANDHILLS GRADING & PIPE CORPORATION, CAROLINA UTILITY AND GRADING, INC., GLORIA BRIDGES PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LEXINGTON STATE BANK v. BRIDGE BANK, N.A.
as 1:2007cv00369
Plaintiff:
LEXINGTON STATE BANK
Defendant:
BRIDGE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
