Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 119
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00929
Plaintiff: ANDREW M. KING
Defendant: TERRY JOHNSON, RAHEEM ALEEM, OFFICER HERBIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON
as 1:2022cv00855
Plaintiff: ANDREW M. KING
Defendant: TERRY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIGGINS v. CHATHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2022cv00723
Plaintiff: ALLEN KING WIGGINS
Defendant: CHATHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff: ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Defendant: TERRY JOHNSON, LIETENANT MCCLURE, N. TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff: NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant: DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. KING
as 1:2022cv00307
Plaintiff: NATHAN WILSON
Defendant: PAUL KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
WILSON v. KING We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00226
Plaintiff: NATHAN WILSON
Defendant: PAUL KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
SUTPHIN v. CITY OF KING N.C.
as 1:2022cv00202
Plaintiff: GREGORY ALLEN SUTPHIN
Defendant: CITY OF KING N.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUTPHIN v. KING POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00093
Plaintiff: GREGORY ALLEN SUTPHIN
Defendant: KING POLICE DEPARTMENT and JORDAN BOYETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00913
Plaintiff: IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant: T.A. WEAVIL, C. SHEETS, S. JARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?