Cases 31 - 40 of 161
QUINLAN et al v. MCSHARRY et al
as 1:2020cv00265
Defendant:
Meghan Ann McSharry and Matthew C. McSharry
Plaintiff:
Ciera A. Quinlan and Kelly M. Quinlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00212
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
SANDRA ANN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WYATT v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv01223
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA ANNE WYATT
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC. v. LATINO, et al
as 1:2019cv00713
Defendant:
KEN BROWNING, MICHAEL D. ZORN, ANNE LATION and others
Plaintiff:
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
TURNER v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2019cv00378
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ann Turner
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. SENTRY CASUALTY COMPANY, et al
as 1:2018cv00932
Defendant:
ROBERT JOSEPH ELLIS, COVIL CORPORATION, Darrell Connor and others
Plaintiff:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DOE v. THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2018cv00726
Defendant:
CAROL L. FOLT, KENNETH T. ANDREWS, THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL and others
Plaintiff:
PROFESSOR DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROGERS v. ROGERS et al
as 1:2018cv00691
Defendant:
BETH ANN ROGERS and DOES 1 TO 5, INCLUSIVE
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHAPPELL v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00576
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
HEATHER ANN CHAPPELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
WOOLARD et al v. CARRIER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv00410
Plaintiff:
LARRY WOOLARD and ANNE WOOLARD
Defendant:
CARRIER CORPORATION , CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY (DELAWARE) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
