Cases 41 - 50 of 64
FUHR v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00478
Plaintiff:
TAMMIE MILLER FUHR
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. MESSER
as 1:2014cv00344
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , BOCEPHUS MUSIC, INC. , SONY/ATV SONGS LLC and others
Defendant:
TAMMY JEAN MESSER
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BURGESS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00925
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
TAMMY BURGESS
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
TOWNSEND v. USA
as 1:2013cv00367
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TAMMIE KAY TOWNSEND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JOHNSON et al v. PROSPECT MORTGAGE, LLC
as 1:2013cv00331
Plaintiff:
STACEY JOHNSON , MICHELLE MALONE and TAMMY SMITH
Defendant:
PROSPECT MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ROSE v. THE LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN OF LUTHERAN SERVICES FOR THE AGING, INC., et al
as 1:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
TAMMY L. ROSE
Defendant:
THE LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN OF LUTHERAN SERVICES FOR THE AGING, INC., LUTHERAN SERVICES FOR THE AGING, INC. and THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SMITH v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2011cv00719
Plaintiff:
TAMMY SMITH
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WILSON et al v. CPI USA NORTH CAROLINA LLC, et al
as 1:2011cv00689
Plaintiff:
TROY L. WILSON , TEXIE J. WILSON , CLAUDE A. MCCANN and others
Defendant:
CPI USA NORTH CAROLINA, LLC and CAPITAL POWER OPERATIONS (USA) INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
