Cases 51 - 60 of 270
HANDY v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00869
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
DAVID WAYNE HANDY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00757
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00407
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
FULTON v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00354
Plaintiff:
WAYNE FULTON
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
JOYCE v. PUGH OIL CO. INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00309
Defendant:
ALAN VIRGIL PUGH, REV. TITUS ADRAIN PUGH, PUGH OIL CO. INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYCE v. COOPER et al
as 1:2020cv00188
Defendant:
CATHERINE BEANE, BILLY COLLINS, ROY COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOYCE v. PUGH OIL CO. INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00189
Defendant:
RICHARD K. PUGH, BETTY PUGH, ALAN VERGIL PUGH and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00063
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00064
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
ROGERS v. CAMPBELL et al
as 1:2020cv00032
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. ROGERS
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA GUILFORD COUNTY, CHIEF WAYNE SCOTT, EMERALD M. CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
