Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 61 - 70 of 112
TATE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2014cv00275
Plaintiff: HERMAN V. TATE
Defendant: LEWIS SMITH, RICHARD RUSSELL and WENDY BREWTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00125
Plaintiff: HERMAN V. TATE
Defendant: LEWIS SMITH, RICHARD RUSSELL and WENDY BREWTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2014cv00049
Plaintiff: HERMAN V. TATE
Defendant: LEWIS SMITH, RICHARD RUSSELL and WENDY BREWTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL et al v. SELECT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2013cv00962
Plaintiff: JAMARCUS RUSSELL and CALVIN PACE
Defendant: NSA-SP#3, LLC , Taylor Funding, LLC and Northland Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
FORD v. USA
as 1:2013cv00740
Petitioner: CHARLES RUSSELL FORD
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2013cv00640
Petitioner: RUSSELL EDWARD JOHNSON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LOPEZ v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2013cv00343
Plaintiff: JUAN LOPEZ
Defendant: ROBERT C. LEWIS, LEWIS SMITH, SAMI ABDUL HASSAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMPTOM-BEY v. RUSSELL et al
as 1:2013cv00261
Plaintiff: JON'TA TOMORREEA HAMPTOM-BEY
Defendant: VERNON A. RUSSELL, THOMAS BARCELLONA and CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RUSSELL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013mc00017
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent: DAVID N. RUSSELL
BAILEY v. DEFRANCO et al
as 1:2012cv01275
Plaintiff: HENRY MARSHALL BAILEY
Defendant: MICHAEL DEFRANCO, DAVID Q. LABARRE and LEROY RUSSELL CASTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?