Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
YOUNG v. NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURE AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2008cv00894
Plaintiff:
LEE YOUNG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURE AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA and STANLEY BATTLE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
OVERTON v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2008cv00026
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LEE OVERTON
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO, DAVIS B LUMPKIN, ANTHONY R SCHALLERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices
HUFF v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA-CONSTITUENT
as 1:2007cv00895
Plaintiff:
ANNA ANITA HUFF
Defendant:
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA-CONSTITUENT N.C.A&T STATE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
THEODORE v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL et al
as 1:2007cv00207
Plaintiff:
ADREA THEODORE
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, JOHN T. BENJAMIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
