Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 61 - 70 of 70
JENKINS v. FEDERAL MEDIAL CENTER et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff: ARDELL L. JENKINS
Defendant: FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, WARDEN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANGUM v. USA et al
as 1:2014cv00343
Petitioner: ANTHONY WAYNE MANGUM
Respondent: USA , BUREAU PRISONS and WARDEN S. HALLEMBAEK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RIPPY v. WARDEN OF CENTRAL PRISON
as 1:2014cv00260
Petitioner: CHARLES A. RIPPY, JR.
Respondent: WARDEN OF CENTRAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MEBANE v. SAUNDERS et al
as 1:2014cv00115
Defendant: ASST. WARDEN LITTLE, MR. SORRELL SAUNDERS, MARY LOCKLEAR and others
Plaintiff: JAMES LEE MEBANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAL v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ET AL
as 1:2013cv00512
Plaintiff: ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant: N.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, WARDEN and ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUEVANO v. U.S. SUPREME IN D.C et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00251
Plaintiff: JAIME LUEVANO
Defendant: U.S. SUPREME IN D.C, U.S. FITH CIRCUIT, TEXAS STATE COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARDY v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2012cv00123
Plaintiff: LESTER HARDY
Defendant: WARDEN and ROBERT C. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOWELL et al v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00118
Petitioner: RANDY THOMAS SOWELL, JR. and WARDEN FOR YAZOO MISSISSIPPI
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WOODS v. COUNTY OF WILSON et al
as 1:2010cv00474
Plaintiff: ISAAC LEE WOODS
Defendant: COUNTY OF WILSON, WILSON COUNTY MANAGER, WAYNE GAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARDEN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00106
Plaintiff: RONALD L. WARDEN
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?