Cases 1 - 9 of 9
YOUNG v. STONE et al
as 1:2018cv00980
Defendant:
RICHARD CLAY PLUNKETT, JAMES K. ROBERSON, G. WAYNE ABERNATHY and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC. v. BENSON, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv01040
Plaintiff:
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC.
Defendant:
BRITTNEY BENSON , NICOLE M. BOSSARD , JEREMY WALLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
VAN DYKE v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv00678
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
KENT BROWN, FRANK WITNEY, ROBERT DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2015cv00312
Plaintiff:
DENNIS VAN DYKE
Defendant:
THOMAS DAVIS, ROBERT JAMES DAVIS, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI v. SLUSSER et al
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI
Defendant:
SCOTT T. SLUSSER, SEAN PERRIN, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. PIEDMONT CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL et al
as 1:2014cv00668
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant:
PIEDMONT CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL, TABOR CITY CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL, PENDER CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant:
ROGER JAMES DAVIS, BRUSE BURGER, CHARLES VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ABERNATHY
as 1:2014mc00007
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CYNTHIA KAY ABERNATHY
ABERNATHY et al v. A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv00836
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD ABERNATHY and OPAL S. ABERNATHY
Defendant:
A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
