Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HICKMAN, JR. v. FCI FORT DIX We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00142
Petitioner: GENE LEGRAND HICKMAN, JR.
Respondent: FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MURPHY et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff: ADRIAN MURPHY, AKEYA SIMPKINS, ALAN YOUNG and others
Defendant: TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TITLEMAX OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
BROUGHTON v. FORT DIX MAIL DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff: JONATHAN S. BROUGHTON
Defendant: FORT DIX MAIL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORTE v. USA
as 1:2020cv00069
Petitioner: HAROLD LUZONE FORTE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FORTE v. USA
as 1:2019cv00828
Petitioner: HAROLD LUZONE FORTE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FORT v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00529
Plaintiff: EUGENE WILLINGHAM FORT
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
EDWARDS v. FORT DIX FCI
as 1:2014cv00922
Plaintiff: LELAND K. EDWARDS
Defendant: FORT DIX FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hood v. FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2010cv00624
Plaintiff: Michael Hood
Defendant: FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION et al v. FORTE et al
as 1:2009mc00018
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Defendant: JOSEPH S. FORTE and JOSEPH FORTE, L.P.
BOGUTSKY v. FORT DEARBORN LIFE INS. CO, et al
as 1:2008cv00713
Plaintiff: ROBERT C. BOGUTSKY
Defendant: FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, DISABILITY REINSURANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and ELTECH ELECTRONICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?