Cases 1 - 10 of 70
HARVEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
KEVIN TERRELL HARVEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SEALY et al v. OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
as 1:2023cv00819
Plaintiff:
DAVID K. SEALY, KERRY CARTER and HARVEY L. DAVIS
Defendant:
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
HARVEY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00331
Petitioner:
KEVIN TERRELL HARVEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LIPSCOMB v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
HARVEY JUNIOR LIPSCOMB
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DAVIS v. OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
as 1:2022cv00990
Plaintiff:
HARVEY L. DAVIS
Defendant:
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TYLER v. KEVEER et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, J. CLARK FISCHER, TIFFANY A. HALL and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. KEVEER et al
as 1:2021cv00060
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, J. CLARK FISCHER, TIFFANY A. HALL and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIPSCOMB v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01073
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
HARVEY LIPSCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
DRUMWRIGHT et al v. COLE et al
as 1:2020cv00998
Plaintiff:
Rev. GREGORY B. DRUMWRIGHT, Edith Ann Jones, MELANIE MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF TERRY S. JOHNSON, Chief Mary Kristy Cole, JONATHAN FRANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
