Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ROBERTS v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv01024
Plaintiff: DA'QUAHN A. ROBERTS
Defendant: MARCUS SCOTT, VALRIS JERNIGAN, FNU WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIVENS-BEY v. FNU - CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff: ARTHUR LEE GIVENS-BEY, IV
Defendant: FNU - CARTER, FNU - REVELS, FNU - ADKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REVELS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00278
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: EARL DWIGHT REVELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PHILLIPS v. NAPHCARE, INC., ET AL. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00974
Defendant: MICHAEL VAN SICKLE, IVY MANNING, AMY JO ROSENTHAL and others
Plaintiff: ROBIN DENISE PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCNEILL v. GADDY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00786
Defendant: PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR, DEAN LOCKLEAR, CAMERON GADDY and others
Plaintiff: JAMES C. MCNEILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REVELS v. USA
as 1:2018cv00344
Petitioner: EARL DWIGHT REVELS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HUDSON v. REVELS et al
as 1:2018cv00065
Plaintiff: JOHN SCOTT HUDSON
Defendant: WHITNEY DANIELLE REVELS, DEAN LOCKLEAR, RONALD COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. HOKE COUNTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00987
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEWIS
Defendant: HOKE COUNTY, HUBERT PETERKIN, ABL FOOD SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrow v. Revell
as 1:2016cv01311
Petitioner: MICHAEL FARROW
Respondent: SARA M. REVELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REVELS v. USA
as 1:2016cv00727
Petitioner: EARL DWIGHT REVELS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?