Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Torres v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Reep et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Foothills Correctional Institute Wardens et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Foothills Correctional Institute Wardens, FNU Bevins, FNU Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Cooper et al
as 1:2023cv00093
Defendant:
Ralph Gilbert, III, Douglas Gold, Roy Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. USA
as 1:2022cv00216
Petitioner:
Michael Dewayne Clark
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Norman v. Brown
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Dasha Clark Norman
Defendant:
Wayn Brown and Wayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Clark
as 1:2021cv00363
Petitioner:
Raymond Harris
Respondent:
Demetrius A. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. USA
as 3:2021cv00563
Petitioner:
Ronald Tamarcus Clark
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robinson et al v. McDowell County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv00246
Plaintiff:
Martin Ray Robinson, James Julius Lumpkin, David Kenneth Fowler and others
Defendant:
McDowell County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Clark et al
as 3:2021cv00254
Plaintiff:
Raheem K. Fuller and Kaywon Butler
Defendant:
FNU Hildebrand and R. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
