Cases 91 - 100 of 199
Parks v. Smith
as 3:2013cv00480
Petitioner:
Tommie E. Parks
Respondent:
Lewis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Smith
as 1:2013cv00182
Petitioner:
Tommy Wayne Harris, Jr.
Respondent:
Lewis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Deal et al
as 5:2013cv00082
Plaintiff:
William Gerald Price
Defendant:
Diane C. Deal , Michael Vetro, Sr. , Joseph Thompson, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brissie et al v. Law Firm of Hutchins, Senester, & Kellam & Pettit, PA
as 3:2013cv00322
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Brissie and Denise Cloninger Brissie
Defendant:
Law Firm of Hutchins, Senester, & Kellam & Pettit, PA , Valerie Lewis, Fannie Mae and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Davis v. Union County Sheriff et al
as 3:2013cv00293
Plaintiff:
Lewis Nathaniel Davis, III
Defendant:
Union County Sheriff, FNU Cathy and FNU Machell
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Montehermoso v. Lewis et al
as 1:2013cv00117
Petitioner:
Haiber V. Montehermoso
Respondent:
Robert Lewis, Mike Boll, Administrative Assistant and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Echeverria v. Lewis
as 1:2013de00110
Petitioner:
Olivo Ramirez Echeverria
Respondent:
Robert Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reynolds v. Shanahan
as 5:2013cv00060
Petitioner:
William L. Reynolds
Respondent:
Lewis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Varney v. Hassan et al
as 3:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Lowell Mason Varney
Defendant:
Sami Hassan, Lawrence Parsons, FNU Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lewis et al
as 3:2013de00148
Plaintiff:
Zane Johnson
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, Kenneth E. Lassiter, James Rice and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
