Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Branch Banking & Trust Company, Inc. v. Trakas et al
as 1:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
Branch Banking & Trust Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Nicholas Dimitri Trakas, Kelly Hearn Trakas and United States of America Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Yates et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2015cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jesse G. Yates, III and Melissa Yates
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carriker v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
Phillip Duane Carriker
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, United States Department of the Treasury and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bonifatto v. USA et al
as 3:2013mc00124
Petitioner:
Teresa Bonifatto
Respondent:
USA , Internal Revenue Service and Justin Bourne
Latimer v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2012cv00219
Plaintiff:
Calvin G. Latimer
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Carter v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Audrey Carter
Defendant:
Greg Sullivan, Steve Hallett, Tera Teague Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
Billy D. Floyd
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2009mc00030
Petitioner:
Internal Revenue Service
Spangler v. Demshock et al
as 2:2009cv00018
Plaintiff:
Albert C. Spangler
Defendant:
Lynn Demshock, Automatic Data Processing, Inc., Mary Hannah and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00477
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
