Cases 11 - 20 of 29
McDaniel v. Bailey et al
as 3:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Michelle Feimster Bailey, Infinity Bail Bonds, LLC, Richard Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools et al
as 3:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, Patricia Falk and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Duncan v. McDaniel
as 1:2017cv00315
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Duncan
Defendant:
Ronna Romney McDaniel
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Avery Mitchell Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2017cv00235
Plaintiff:
Gary Leon Duncan
Defendant:
Avery Mitchell Correctional Institute, Ronna Romney McDaniel, Mike Ball and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Taylor et al
as 1:2017cv00228
Plaintiff:
Johnnie D. Allen
Defendant:
FNU Taylor, Morris R. McDaniels, Jeffery James and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Bailey et al
as 3:2017cv00448
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Michelle Feimster Bailey, Infinity Bail Bonds, LLC, Richard Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
McDaniel v. VTT Management Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00826
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
VTT Management Inc. , VTT Charlotte LLC , Debbie Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
McDaniel v. USA
as 3:2016cv00445
Petitioner:
Antonio Stowe McDaniel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McDaniel v. USA
as 3:2016cv00371
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Antonio Vladimar Stowe McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
