Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Taft et al v. Siegwerk USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Taft, Jr. and RTB, Inc.
Defendant:
Siegwerk USA, Inc. , Terry Davis , Daniel McDowell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. Albany International Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00262
Plaintiff:
Erik Ross Phillips and Gina Phillips
Defendant:
Albany International Corporation, AstenJohnson, Inc., B E & K Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Thomas et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00507
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bruce Thomas and Sandra Hinson Thomas
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Blackmer Pump, Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross v. Bowers et al
as 3:2010cv00452
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Defendant:
Walter Bowers, Jr. and William Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trimnal v. Ortho Pros Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
Linda Trimnal
Defendant:
Ortho Pros Express, Inc., Atlantic Coast Orthopaedic Medical Supplies, Inc., Atlantic Coast Resources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ross et al v. Flo Foods, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00356
Plaintiff:
Roger Ross and Cynthia Ross
Defendant:
Flo Foods, Inc. and Tracy E. Faust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ross et al v. Flo Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00137
Plaintiff:
Roger Ross and Cynthia Ross
Defendant:
Flo Foods, Inc. and Tracy E. Faust
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Price v. USA
as 5:2009cv00132
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ross Lance Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ross v. Gordon & Weinberg, P.C. et al
as 3:2009cv00482
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Ross, Jr
Defendant:
Gordon & Weinberg, P.C. and Unifund CCR Partners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ross v. USA
as 1:2009cv00365
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
