Cases 51 - 60 of 127
Diz v. Martin et al
as 1:2017cv00319
Defendant:
Jeff Tacy, Adam Bull, Louis Vega and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Diz
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pierce v. Hooks
as 5:2017cv00207
Petitioner:
Kelly Winton Pierce
Respondent:
Erik Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly et al v. Nirvanam, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nichelle Kelly , Nicole Kelly , Jennifer Messer and others
Defendant:
Nirvanam, Inc. and Prafull Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
The Netherlands Insurance Company v. Souther et al
as 5:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
The Netherlands Insurance Company
Defendant:
Douglas R. Souther, Iredell-Statesville Board of Education , Nina I. McVay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Solomon et al
as 3:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
Willie T. Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
George T. Solomon, R. D. Mitchell, Alfred William and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
iPayment, Inc. v. 1st Americard, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
iPayment, Inc.
Defendant:
1st Americard, Inc., Kelly Grainger and Estate of George Gregory Grainger
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
iPayment, Inc. v. 1st Americard, Inc. et al
as 3:2017mc00046
Plaintiff:
iPayment, Inc.
Defendant:
1st Americard, Inc., Kelly Grainger and Estate of George Gregory Grainger
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Myers, et al v. Bradford Preparatory School, et al
as 3:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Romus Myers and Nikki Rush
Defendant:
Bradford Preparatory School , Kelly Painter and Jeff McManus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopson v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00351
Plaintiff:
Edward Kelly Hopson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Surgeon v. Sharp
as 3:2016cv00737
Plaintiff:
Surgeon and Gary Surgeon
Defendant:
Sharp and Kelly Sharp doing business as HeySharp, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Kelly Sharp
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
