Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jarvis v. Jarvis et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Carolyn Jarvis, Michelle Shook, Robyn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Iredell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Iredell County Detention Center, Travis Ward, John Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bittle v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Charlotte Transportation Center, Unemployment North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. North Carolina Division of Employment Security
as 3:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
North Carolina Division of Employment Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. Sigis El Owl
as 3:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
Sigis El Owl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. Go Tires Auto Repair
as 3:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
Go Tires Auto Repair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. Go Tires & Auto Repair LLC
as 3:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
Go Tires & Auto Repair LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. Atrium Health Behavioral
as 3:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
Atrium Health Behavioral
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. N.C. Unemployment Division Pandemic
as 3:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
N.C. Unemployment Division Pandemic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.