Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Osnarque v. Bender et al
as 3:2022cv00646
Plaintiff:
Yilien Osnarque
Defendant:
Harold Bender, Nicole Epstein, David S. Cayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bender v. State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2022cv00364
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Bender
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Garry L. McFadden
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Glover v. Newman et al
as 1:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
Bruce Wayne Glover
Defendant:
Greg Newman, Doug Mundy and Michael Bender
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bender v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv00846
Plaintiff:
Glasco H. Bender, Jr.
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bender v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00178
Plaintiff:
Carla Danielle Bender
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Prospect Capital Corporation et al v. Cole et al
as 3:2009cv00546
Plaintiff:
Prospect Capital Corporation, Prospect Capital Corporation, Prospect Capital Corporation and others
Defendant:
Charles J. Cole, Nathan M. Bender, Nathan M. Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Chubirko v. Better Business Bureau of Southern Piedmont, Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00502
Plaintiff:
John Chubirko
Defendant:
Better Business Bureau of Southern Piedmont, Inc, Sue Breckenridge, Rick Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Kirk et al v. Gilchrist et al
as 3:2007cv00392
Plaintiff:
Kareem A. Kirk, O'Brian L. Collins, Terrell Irving and others
Defendant:
Peter S. Gilchrist, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
