Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent:
NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strong v. Shelter Plus Care et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Zachary Strong
Defendant:
Shelter Plus Care, Mecklenburg County, Kenya Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. USA
as 3:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Darris Dee Marshall
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Freeman et al
as 5:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FNU Freeman, FNU Honeycutt, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Marshall et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FNU Marshall, FNU Cox, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Streeter v. Williams
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Faith Sherrie Streeter
Defendant:
Marshall Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Deja Mone't Moore
Defendant:
Marshall Williams, Robert Allen, Miranda Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shine v. U.S. Marshall
as 3:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
Kerry Shine
Respondent:
U.S. Marshall
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rudisill v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Dwight A. Rudisill
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, David Alan Brown, Sr., Unknown United States Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
