Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Osborne v. USA
as 5:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Pamela Ladawn Councill Osborne
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Erwin v. Gaston County Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 3:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Kanisha Monique Latrice Erwin
Defendant:
Gaston County Department of Health & Human Services, Angela C. Karchmer, Tereasa L. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cain v. Osborne et al
as 5:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Acquilla Booze Cain, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Osborne and FNU Sidburry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Iredell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Iredell County Detention Center, Travis Ward, John Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cain v. Osborne et al
as 5:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Acquilla Booze Cain, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Osborne, FNU Sidberry, FNU Canter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinkade v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Wanda Osborne Kinkade
Defendant:
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Hefner v. Jones et al
as 1:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Hefner
Defendant:
Johnathan Heath Jones, Kimberly Osborne-Evans, Sylva Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborne v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00009
Plaintiff:
Nickie Osborne
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Osborne v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv00217
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Osborne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Osborne v. Cooper
as 3:2018cv00412
Petitioner:
Robert James Osborne
Respondent:
Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
