Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Casanova v. Pfizer and Affiliates et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
Pfizer and Affiliates, Actalent Temporary Agency and Affiliates, GRAIL INC. and Affiliates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Casanova v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Federal Government, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vang v. Catawba Medical Center et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Pakuja Crystal Vang
Defendant:
Catawba Medical Center, Catawba Valley Family Medicine Claremont, Bethany Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kehoe v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Kehoe
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Walmart and Walmart Inc. doing business as Walmart
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Riggs v. Walmart
as 3:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
Karen M Riggs
Defendant:
Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
