Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Humud v. Correctional Officer et al
as 2:2022cv00751
Plaintiff:
Ayman A. Humud
Defendant:
Correctional Officer, Corpral Curatolo, C.O #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parveen et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2021cv01513
Plaintiff:
Ayman Atique Khan and Sahanaj Parveen
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Monty Wilkinson and Tracy Renaud
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chunn et al v. Edge
as 1:2020cv01590
Respondent:
Warden Derek Edge
Petitioner:
Ayman Rabadi, Hassan Chunn, Justin Rodriguez and others
Intervenor:
David S Bralow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Ciancimino et al
as 1:2019cv03933
Defendant:
AYM Physical Therapy, P.C., Sound Spine Chiropractic, P.C., A.C. Medical, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ayoub v. EgyptAir
as 1:2018cv01859
Plaintiff:
Ayman Ayoub
Defendant:
EgyptAir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ayoub v. EgyptAir
as 1:2018cv01857
Plaintiff:
Ayman Ayoub
Defendant:
EgyptAir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ayoub v. EgyptAir
as 1:2018cv01854
Plaintiff:
Ayman Ayoub
Defendant:
EgyptAir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
