Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Both v. Pacific Medical Revenue, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv07578
Plaintiff:
John Both
Defendant:
Pacific Medical Revenue, Inc. and Ethne Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nance v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv03286
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Nance
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nance v. Anderson et al
as 1:2015cv00101
Defendant:
P.O. Alveras, Antenner Anderson, P.O. Borestein and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nance v. Heley et al
as 1:2014cv06174
Defendant:
Director South Beach Psych Center, J. Foley, Director Peggy Heley and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04708
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance v. Heley
as 1:2011cv01173
Respondent:
Peggy Heley
Petitioner:
Harold M Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nance v. Padughbe et al
as 1:2011cv00583
Defendant:
T.A. Albert, T.A. Cassius, Dr. John Doe and others
S.W:
Abraham Davis
Plaintiff:
Harold M Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ICAP North America, Inc. et al v. Illari
as 2:2009cv00637
Plaintiff:
ICAP North America, Inc., The Exco Noonan Inc. Pension Plan, The Exco Noonan Inc. Pension Plan Committee and others
Defendant:
Joseph Illari
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ICAP North America, Inc. et al v. Provenzano
as 1:2008cv04108
Plaintiff:
ICAP North America, Inc., The Exco Noonan Inc. Pension Plan, The Exco Noonan Inc. Pension Plan Committee and others
Defendant:
Joseph Provenzano
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
